DARPA
ITO graphic
Embedded Software
Working Group

April 10-11 2001
University of California - Berkeley
Berkeley, CA
Agenda blueball Hotel Information blueball Register Online
Tenative Agenda

The meetings will be held at Richmond Field Station on the University of California campus in Richmond, CA. Click on the link below to get a map and directions.

http://www.path.berkeley.edu/PATH/General/Directions/Directions.html

Tuesday, April 10, 2001
08:00-08:15 Welcome from UC Berkeley
Opening Comments - Dr. Janos Sztipanovits, DARPA and AFRL
08:15-09:45 Phase II OEP Briefings (Boeing, Berkeley) - 45 minutes each
09:45-10:00 BREAK
10:00-11:00 OEP Experiment Identification I
11:00-12:00 OEP Experiment Identification II (Switch Sessions)
12:00-02:00 Lunch and Automotive OEP Tour
02:00-04:00 OEP Experiment Definition - Session I
04:00-04:30 BREAK
04:30-06:00 OEP Experiment Definition - Session II
06:00-06:30 Day 1 wrap-up (Janos, Berkeley, Boeing, AFRL)
Wednesday, April 11, 2001
08:00-08:10 Opening Comments - Dr. Janos Sztipanovits
08:10-09:40 OEP Experiment Definition - Session III
09:40-10:00 BREAK
10:00-11:30 OEP Experiment Definition - Session IV
11:30-01:30 Lunch and Automotive OEP Tour
01:30-02:30 OEP Outbriefs (30 minutes each)
02:30-03:00 Review of Action Items - AFRL
Final comments - Dr. Janos Sztipanovits
03:00 Adjourn
03:00-05:00 Teja Technologies Tutorial (Participation is Optional)

Preparation for Embedded Systems Working Group #2 Meeting

I. OEPs should prepare to brief the following information (30-45 minutes each) and/or discuss during Breakout sessions:
  1. Progress to date on discussions with Phase I technology developers
  2. Discuss baseline technology components for testbed (i.e., what will be provided)
  3. Discuss how each Phase I technology fits within the OEP Midterm Experiments and Demonstrations (FY02)
    1. Midterm experiments and demonstrations.
    2. Challenge Problems that each experiment will address (or what part of the challenge problem will be addressed)
    3. Phase I technologies that each experiment will include (or what part)
    4. Discuss any "gap areas" which need to be addressed
    5. How Phase I technology will be implemented in experiments.
  4. Success Criteria
    1. How to measure improvements in using MoBIES technology vs. current methods?
II. Phase I technology developers should come prepared to discuss and/or brief the following information during OEP Breakout Sessions (i.e., charts are preferred)
  1. Discuss OEP and Challenge Problem(s) they plan to address
    1. What experiments can be conducted?
  2. Discuss, in terms of the OEP, plans to meet FY02 Program Milestones
  3. Discuss plans for integrated or federated experiments to conduct to meet FY01 milestones
  4. Discuss "Success Criteria" for Phase I technology, expressed in terms of the MoBIES challenges (i.e., how to determine the technology meets its preliminary goal)
III. ESWG #2 Success Criteria (How to determine if this meeting was a success?)
  1. Each Phase I technology developer is tied to at least 1 OEP Midterm Experiment or Demonstration
  2. OEPs have clear understanding of where Phase I technologies fit into Midterm Experiments and Demonstrations
  3. "Gap Areas" are identified and a resolution plan is accomplished
    1. Phase I Technology developers identify "gap areas" in OEPs
      1. Missing models
      2. Challenge problem requirements and success criteria
      3. Tools from OEP that will be provided to Phase I technology developers
      4. Scheduling of resources to test Phase I technology
    2. OEPs identify critical areas related to Challenge Problem that are currently not addressed by Phase I technology
      1. Are workarounds needed?
  4. Identify Phase I technology demonstrations that will meet FY01 Program Milestones (4QFY01)
  5. OEPs have a Draft plan for meeting Midterm Experiment milestone (2QFY02)
    1. Identify strong performers

Direct comments concerning this meeting to: John Luca